If we look backward rationalism, fideisme and relativisme, therefore as clear that attitudes base faults that lay in its imbalance. One that we look for are poised attitude. Poised attitude is accessible attitude and comment correctness elements in three that extreme attitude, but links it each other.
We start with fideisme. Fideisme accentuates to keep the faith, believe to godlike apocalypse. If believe person to God, it directly will admit that fideisme's base attitude that is right. If Allah really available, clear God that there is absolute, both as truth, and also at the mercy for act. Therefore the word God are absolute right and constitute absolute grapple for human. Fairly person devouting to go upon its life on God's apocalypse.
But then, just kemutlakan God that is that necessarily make fideis's clan realizes that human ability for bernalar to need is used, even it sinninging to God Creator if it doesn't want bernalar. Why?
Since, all what aught is God's creature, most plausible kindness in its own right for bernalar. So, akalbudi and apocalypse comes from same source, of Allah. And therefore, it is impossible its tandem prinsipiil's ala at cross.
So, are may not, if man uses nalarnya ala is right, its mean in public, critical, visceral, it comes up to usufruct that in opposition to apocalypse. Since every thing comes from same source, therefore there's only one truth. It also means that is imprecise if subjective nalar apocalypse was formulated by begini: Use nalar in as much as doesn't concern to fill apocalypse. nalar's essence man is look for levels with another. Someone will sin if sought after decreed truth pitch upon on the dot particular. Sin to Her the will that creates nalar that.
Therefore, all apocalypse conflict resolving nalar who gets to pattern: Reduce, or discontinues reasoning, don't bernalar radically etcetera, are incorrect. Incorrectly to nalar, incorrectly morally because open door on smooth-faced attitude and deceit, and incorrectly ala keagamaan because denies that nalar comes from God. Are not right that opinion getting devout someone, progressively it don't think, look for, investigate and knowing.
Then, why exists discrepancy among apocalypse and nalar is man? On pengandalan upon, actually may not there is perten puts hand out, and that discrepancy is visible tentative. That thing not marvels. Nalar is man never perfect, never catches all truth. la likes to see one angle and forgets its the one. la is affected by its think. Of which meanwhile discrepancy? Discrepancy among apocalypse and nalar can come from keduabelah party, from fihak nalar and of side apocalypse.
At one party, nalar can overreach it. moderen's scholarship theory makes we so aware of limitation nalar . .Misal it just, that atheisme's statement "God no" according to present methodology is not rasional. If Allah available, therefore Allah settles nalar man, therefore good marks sense and also not mark sense can't thru ensure sheer.
But frequent fault lies is not at nalar's party, but at apocalypse party. Indeed is not on that apocalypse is alone. Alone apocalypse can't false because apocalypse be God's The Word that correctness Mighty. But, trick humaning to catch and mengartikan is apocalypse can just incorrect, since for it man unlikelying to use same nalar one also at uses deep exploratory scientific or deep philosophy. So gets happening even discrepancy among nalar and what does be looked on apocalypse, since man calls apocalypse truth something that actually don't apocalypse, but its conjugation. So, that contradiction lie don't among apocalypse and nalar, but among nalar's conjugation man about nalar's apocalypse and result other man.
Of there gets to be gleaned from that among apocalypse and man science may not there is discrepancy, origin is keduabelah even party knows their bounds each. If there is discrepancy, that discrepancy actually never happens among apocalypse and nalar, but among nalar the one (one that tries to understand, and thus always also conjugate apocalypse) with nalar another one (one that is used deep scientific activity and also deep life everyday).
There is affix judgment. Apocalypse and nalar comes from same source, which is Allah. Therefore tandem it mandatory used by all the best, but terminologicaling fathoms a meaning each.
Presumably human being made bernalar's creature by Creators in order to it uses nalarnya that all the best to render its life. So, nalar is given for things what do lie within range nalar that. Whatever available within range nalar is circumscribed nature, nature most composes.
Therefore nalar that was called to look for science and savvy that progressively is right and men in about exhaustive creature nature. To it, man can develop scholarships by each to investigate what aughts. Region nalar is human alone, inderawi's nature and society. Meanwhile Allah can't "gained control" by nalar .Satu one the approachable nalar wends God are its openness, and sought after God's magnitude track in creature. But about who God that actually, how lives Allah spiritual, what do become the will and its charge and its attitude to man, that all ala prinsipiil out of reach by nalar man (Why? Since nalar is man gets circumscribed character / finite so God's specification that just are not circumscribed / boundless not teljangkau by it).
This judgment points out also for the purpose what God please to down its apocalypse. Presumably don't to inform things yangjuga can be investigated and is known nalaryangjustru thru also been given by God. One apocalypse will want to make bernalar's lazy men only. But, apocalypse presumably being given unto by man to know just things don't, and never, can be known by nalar, which is about alone Allah as it were said above. Since skap God concern man that still to lie deep world, therefore in apocalypse also available things which concern the world (particularly what does become responsibility and man liabilities in life it at universalizes, so area moralitas) but not as making known about the world, but about attitude God to her. But then, apocalypse don't intentionally give information about things which also dapatkita investigates to pass through scholarship, but about thing which really can't thru investigate scholarship, about alone Allah.
Therefore gets also be said begini: If nalar wants to answer the most man question fundamental as e.g.:Who is God, what is God's the will and attitude to man, what intent last human, nalar don't be equal to and misinterpretation easy, on one's high horse and misleading.
Conversely,answer about question hits to universalize: E.g. if the sun runs around to earth or contrariwise, how is its happening thread being live at earth (one that is borne out deep its apocalypse that there is the world and that adahidup and that life can amends finally base Allah decision), but also which psikis's structures and man socials, which is economic structures and the most political that match living man with sejahtera; all we carijawabannya is not deep apocalypse, but of our experience, with scholarship help. If we look for answer about man things and secular it in apocalypse, very likely we will misinterpretation and then create discrepancy image that for that matter not true.
Therefore, are not correct have say that gets devout someone get it perceives not necessarily think, look for, investigate and knowing. Just person which steady because potbound in faith, will steadier and brave also to use akalbudinya. la is not afraid with more science critical and visceral will keep away it of faith. And terminologicaling economizes me, we may not give that image getting we think exhaustively and critical, progressively religion lies in danger.
We start with fideisme. Fideisme accentuates to keep the faith, believe to godlike apocalypse. If believe person to God, it directly will admit that fideisme's base attitude that is right. If Allah really available, clear God that there is absolute, both as truth, and also at the mercy for act. Therefore the word God are absolute right and constitute absolute grapple for human. Fairly person devouting to go upon its life on God's apocalypse.
But then, just kemutlakan God that is that necessarily make fideis's clan realizes that human ability for bernalar to need is used, even it sinninging to God Creator if it doesn't want bernalar. Why?
Since, all what aught is God's creature, most plausible kindness in its own right for bernalar. So, akalbudi and apocalypse comes from same source, of Allah. And therefore, it is impossible its tandem prinsipiil's ala at cross.
So, are may not, if man uses nalarnya ala is right, its mean in public, critical, visceral, it comes up to usufruct that in opposition to apocalypse. Since every thing comes from same source, therefore there's only one truth. It also means that is imprecise if subjective nalar apocalypse was formulated by begini: Use nalar in as much as doesn't concern to fill apocalypse. nalar's essence man is look for levels with another. Someone will sin if sought after decreed truth pitch upon on the dot particular. Sin to Her the will that creates nalar that.
Therefore, all apocalypse conflict resolving nalar who gets to pattern: Reduce, or discontinues reasoning, don't bernalar radically etcetera, are incorrect. Incorrectly to nalar, incorrectly morally because open door on smooth-faced attitude and deceit, and incorrectly ala keagamaan because denies that nalar comes from God. Are not right that opinion getting devout someone, progressively it don't think, look for, investigate and knowing.
Then, why exists discrepancy among apocalypse and nalar is man? On pengandalan upon, actually may not there is perten puts hand out, and that discrepancy is visible tentative. That thing not marvels. Nalar is man never perfect, never catches all truth. la likes to see one angle and forgets its the one. la is affected by its think. Of which meanwhile discrepancy? Discrepancy among apocalypse and nalar can come from keduabelah party, from fihak nalar and of side apocalypse.
At one party, nalar can overreach it. moderen's scholarship theory makes we so aware of limitation nalar . .Misal it just, that atheisme's statement "God no" according to present methodology is not rasional. If Allah available, therefore Allah settles nalar man, therefore good marks sense and also not mark sense can't thru ensure sheer.
But frequent fault lies is not at nalar's party, but at apocalypse party. Indeed is not on that apocalypse is alone. Alone apocalypse can't false because apocalypse be God's The Word that correctness Mighty. But, trick humaning to catch and mengartikan is apocalypse can just incorrect, since for it man unlikelying to use same nalar one also at uses deep exploratory scientific or deep philosophy. So gets happening even discrepancy among nalar and what does be looked on apocalypse, since man calls apocalypse truth something that actually don't apocalypse, but its conjugation. So, that contradiction lie don't among apocalypse and nalar, but among nalar's conjugation man about nalar's apocalypse and result other man.
Of there gets to be gleaned from that among apocalypse and man science may not there is discrepancy, origin is keduabelah even party knows their bounds each. If there is discrepancy, that discrepancy actually never happens among apocalypse and nalar, but among nalar the one (one that tries to understand, and thus always also conjugate apocalypse) with nalar another one (one that is used deep scientific activity and also deep life everyday).
There is affix judgment. Apocalypse and nalar comes from same source, which is Allah. Therefore tandem it mandatory used by all the best, but terminologicaling fathoms a meaning each.
Presumably human being made bernalar's creature by Creators in order to it uses nalarnya that all the best to render its life. So, nalar is given for things what do lie within range nalar that. Whatever available within range nalar is circumscribed nature, nature most composes.
Therefore nalar that was called to look for science and savvy that progressively is right and men in about exhaustive creature nature. To it, man can develop scholarships by each to investigate what aughts. Region nalar is human alone, inderawi's nature and society. Meanwhile Allah can't "gained control" by nalar .Satu one the approachable nalar wends God are its openness, and sought after God's magnitude track in creature. But about who God that actually, how lives Allah spiritual, what do become the will and its charge and its attitude to man, that all ala prinsipiil out of reach by nalar man (Why? Since nalar is man gets circumscribed character / finite so God's specification that just are not circumscribed / boundless not teljangkau by it).
This judgment points out also for the purpose what God please to down its apocalypse. Presumably don't to inform things yangjuga can be investigated and is known nalaryangjustru thru also been given by God. One apocalypse will want to make bernalar's lazy men only. But, apocalypse presumably being given unto by man to know just things don't, and never, can be known by nalar, which is about alone Allah as it were said above. Since skap God concern man that still to lie deep world, therefore in apocalypse also available things which concern the world (particularly what does become responsibility and man liabilities in life it at universalizes, so area moralitas) but not as making known about the world, but about attitude God to her. But then, apocalypse don't intentionally give information about things which also dapatkita investigates to pass through scholarship, but about thing which really can't thru investigate scholarship, about alone Allah.
Therefore gets also be said begini: If nalar wants to answer the most man question fundamental as e.g.:Who is God, what is God's the will and attitude to man, what intent last human, nalar don't be equal to and misinterpretation easy, on one's high horse and misleading.
Conversely,answer about question hits to universalize: E.g. if the sun runs around to earth or contrariwise, how is its happening thread being live at earth (one that is borne out deep its apocalypse that there is the world and that adahidup and that life can amends finally base Allah decision), but also which psikis's structures and man socials, which is economic structures and the most political that match living man with sejahtera; all we carijawabannya is not deep apocalypse, but of our experience, with scholarship help. If we look for answer about man things and secular it in apocalypse, very likely we will misinterpretation and then create discrepancy image that for that matter not true.
Therefore, are not correct have say that gets devout someone get it perceives not necessarily think, look for, investigate and knowing. Just person which steady because potbound in faith, will steadier and brave also to use akalbudinya. la is not afraid with more science critical and visceral will keep away it of faith. And terminologicaling economizes me, we may not give that image getting we think exhaustively and critical, progressively religion lies in danger.
0 komentar:
Post a Comment
Please fill your comment