Nalar And Apocalypse

Philosophy and religion talks about the same thing, which is man and its the world. If the one takes in to level with another that indigenous Creators human and its the world, and another one of man mind that does ever be covered to less jelasan and uncertainty, why then person is still is engaged in religion? That is question that don't sparse interposed by bertakwa's person to effort filosof.

That really available its correctness. Science easying to make person as conceit. Philosophy can also make person as conceit, one will the filosof knows one putty it, one that it will must more developed than righteous person. But then, at any other fihak, person that bicara on behalf religion can also sin because conceit. Even that wants to be spoken is God's apocalypse, but it can forget that it is regular own man, circumscribed regular and incertain deep its savvy, also deep terhdap's savvy that apocalypse. So, by arranges "count", we won't far go forward. But then, question upon constant needs we are answering. What logistic philosophy in front with religion that bail its savvy of God's apocalypse? To answer this question, we need beforehand speak relationship among apocalypse and kindness mind